Hundreds of vehicles circle Sask. legislature in support of Unifor 594

Hundreds of vehicles containing job-actioned Co-op Refinery workers, family, friends and supporters circled the Saskatchewan legislature in hopes of reminding Premier Scott Moe and company that they are “ready to work.”

Rally attendees met at the Conexus Arts Centre before arriving at the Saskatchewan legislature building Wednesday morning. Attendees drove in loops honking their horns displaying signs and flags supporting Unifor 594 members in hopes of gaining the attention of the provincial government, who they want to legislate a settlement based on recommendations laid out by provincial mediator Vince Ready.

article continues below

Union members have been in the midst of a job-action strike for the last 146 days. Members called for a strike vote on Dec. 3 with votes being counted on Dec. 4. Over 97 per cent of the near 75 per cent of members who voted were in favour of taking a stance with job action.

Members took to a job action vote in hopes of gaining choice and protection to ensure pension security for workers, according to Unifor 594’s website.

They have been locked out since Dec. 5.

“Protection is about ensuring pension security for those who choose to remain in the defined benefit plan like they were promised when they began working at the refinery,” said Unifor 594’s website.

Of the 1,115 people working at the Co-op Refinery, 729 are unionized members.




© Copyright Pipeline News


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Pipeline News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus